Page 100 - ARTE!Brasileiros #41
P. 100

WILD TALES ENGLISH VERSION

           Who saw “Stories of Sexualities” notice how the exhibition   one of the benefits of the brazilian crisis is put under
           have no libido, has no desire, is a sex reduced to body   widespread suspicion the regime of appearances. The
           parts. Within this scenario confused, where protesters   feeling of sham and inadequacy, helps us understand
           are manipulated and institutions protect themselves   why suddenly we don’t need mediation. Art critics have
           as fortresses, the output appears to be one, at least for   become useless, the teachers are expendable, press plays
           Preciado: “turn out the lights for, without any possibility of   in an evil way what the digital mass would do better and
           spectacle, the Museum can start functioning as Parliament   more spontaneously.
           of Another sensitivity.                             This can help us understand the recent wave of abjure that
                                                               certain artists and their exhibits are suffering (such as the
           El museo erased (Colección Posmuseo) by Paul B. Preciado   Queermuseum of Porto Alegre), hateful to intellectuals
           Malba, Buenos Aires, 2017                           and teachers, (as the public bonfire in which the image
           64 pages. 19 x 13 cm                                of Judith Butler was burned as “witch”), attacks on
           ARS 200;                                            universities and research centers (with reduction of
           tienda.malba.org.ar                                 funds and scrapping scheduled).
                                                               It is as if it were no longer necessary to qualify the
           ARTICLE ART AND PSYCHOANALYSIS | PAGES 76 TO 78     conflict, working to create transformation effects that
           EMPATHY AND CONFLICT                                it not gives without anguish and uncertainty. No need to
                                                               ponder which conflict can be more productive and which
           IN THE AESTHETIC                                    conflict is only an expression of aesthetic enjoyment with
                                                               the complaint or pyrotechnics of hatred. We lost our
           EXPERIENCE                                          curators. Both in the sense of museum curatorship as you
                                                               care, as philosophical attitude of criticism to power. At
                                                               this time many clamor for empathy, solidarity or return
           BY CHRISTIAN INGO LENZ DUNKER                       by the memory of fraternal themes.
                                                               The term empathy was introduced by Robert Vischer in
           AT THE RECENT SHOW organized by the Museum of       “Optical Feeling of Form” (1873) as “projection of human
           Empathy, underway in the MAM ( Museu of Modern Art)   feeling into the world of nature.” Tietchner translated the
           of Sao Paulo, people are invited to wear shoes randomly   German term “Einfüllung”, using the Greek derivation of
           offered while listening to the stories of their owners ‘   pathos, in “empathy”. Pathos in Greek refers to both the
           lives. The idea is a kind of literalisation of the expression   passion and suffering and also the ability to be affected
           “walk with other shoes”. This experience is included in   with the other. Less than disease, pathos is conflict. The
           a series of initiatives that seek to bring the museum   German term contained the radical ein (one) and the
           universe closer to the people, decreasing the popular   verb fullen (feeling) which brings us the feeling of unity.
           impression that the appreciation of works of art is a task   Vischer tried to discern this sense of unity of related
           for very educated people. But is it really that the aesthetic   experiences as feeling with (Mifüllen), the feeling together
           experience is able to handle conflicts, generalizing and   (Zuzamenfüllen) and the near feeling (Nachfüllen). He
           uniting people or she just confirms and deepens the   also tried to separate feelings (Füllen) from sensations
           exclusion of class, race or origin?                 (Empfindung). The participation of the body, the presence
           At the background resonates the thesis that if we   of common humor and compassion are poorly represented
           recognize ourself in the other we can understand ourself   when we look at the more traditional separation between
           better with our own diversity. On the other hand the same   empathy and sympathy.
           work of art that transforms us, because surprises us and   So when we say there’s an affinity based on identifications,
           disturb us, can be reduced to an inauthentic reporting,   we can only conclude that sympathy cames from that,
           only used as sign of class pertinency oe like consumption   but it’s the sympathy of the groups and tastes amongst
           spectacle. A confirmation sign that gives authenticity   themselves, identities and the guidelines, policies,
           and social legitimacy to the wealth that you have may   ethics and aesthetics that has taken us to a state of
           be, at the same time, a source of suspicion about the   obscurantism. The proximity by identification produces
           legitimacy of our own identity.                     conflicts by simple opposition, where the solution is
           Pierre Bordieu showed how the cultural capital tends   the removal of the other’s point of view. Nothing more
           to concentrate, reproducing and building up in a similar   natural than evoke empathy in this context. Empathy
           way of the social capital and by the social capital. But   would be the natural antidote against intolerance,
           what about an elite who can no longer read your own   harassment of foreigners, immigrants and all those
           time, not shy away from your own mediocrity? An elite   who would be “in excess”, and whose elimination would
           that understand the university and culture as a threat   make everything easier.
           to your own core value: money. Until recently the money   Terminological controversy would only be a preciousness
           in Brazil did not require history. It spoke for himself, as   if we do not look for the importance of the difference
           a sign of success and self-righteous power. However,   between identification and empathy. A culture of kindness
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104