Page 103 - ARTE!Brasileiros #58
P. 103

despite praising carnivalized meetings”, he concludes,   Group of five is a drawing that Anita Malfatti                                                           ***  [PAGE 10]
               recalling that at the beginning of the century, the   produced in the second half of 1922, a few months after   If Anita, in the second half of 1922, finds herself
               project in force since the end of the 19th century was   the Semana de Arte Moderna. In it, the artist, in addition   connected with issues specific to the international
               the whitening. of the nation. And he warns: “When we   to portraying herself lying on a divan in the studio of her   art of that period – a time of avant-garde reflux and an
               exchange a solemn imperial repression for another   friend Tarsila do Amaral, also records Mário de Andrade   adherence to an effective synthetic realism, typical of   [PAGES 11 ANd 12]
               repression, it is not a de-repression”. remembering   and Tarsila at the piano and, lying on a rug, Menotti   the aforementioned Return to Order – it can be seen,
               that at the beginning of the century, the project in force   Del Picchia and Oswald de Andrade. In the drawing,   both by the painting that she was producing at the time
               since the end of the 19th century was the whitening of   therefore, five of the main modernists of São Paulo were   as well as for the whole of her studio, that Tarsila do
               the nation. And he warns: “When we exchange a solemn   represented who, for a brief period, developed a strong   Amaral still had a subjectivity linked to the period before    [PAGES 13 to 15]
               imperial repression for another repression, it is not a   coexistence. Observing them together could lead us to   the First World War, an issue that the artist would begin
               de-repression”. remembering that at the beginning of   imagine a coincidence of positions and purposes. But   to want to overcome precisely from the knowledge she
               the century, the project in force since the end of the 19th   we know that things did not happen that way. This text,   acquired with her new Brazilian friends, Anita, Menotti,
               century was the whitening of the nation. And he warns:   not without some sadness, shows some issues that   Mario and Oswald.
               “When we exchange a solemn imperial repression for   connected the members of the group and in the future   However, in 1922, his studio was closer to Helios’
               another repression, it is not a de-repression”.  they would become studies of the artistic and cultural   description than to Anita’s drawing. And both Tarsila and
                                                 reality of São Paulo at the time.  Helios would never completely abandon that attachment
               moDernist women                                                                             ***  to the sumptuous and exotic. This fact, in the case of the
               Modernism is not only made of Mário and Oswalds, Anitas   What stands out in Grupo dos Cinco (pen and pencil   painter, can be seen both in the maintenance of that stilted
               and Tarsilas. Evidently, the Andrades, as many call the   on paper) is that both the delicacy of the line and the use   atmosphere in her studio – still in the late 1920s - and in
               two greatest writers of modernism and who made their   of color and the search for a formal synthesis – which   the extravagant and showy clothes that the artist loved
               first-rate appearance in Semana de 22, are unavoidable.   gives it a certain purposeful “primitivism” – have nothing   to wear on certain occasions. On the other hand, if we
               After all, they developed over decades some of the most   to do with the production that Anita carried out between   want to understand how much Tarsila also sought, in her
               solid cultural projects for the country, suffice it to mention   the early 1910s and 1917. Here she is far from her aesthetic   production, a certain interest in the exotic and mysterious,
               the Anthropophagic Manifesto, formulated by Oswald   motivations derived from the historical avant-gardes   we only need to remember her “anthropophagic phase”:
               in 1928, and the entire project to survey and preserve   (Expressionisms, Futurism, etc.), now more attentive   to the potent, structural dryness of a large part of her
               the national heritage led by the author of Macunaíma.   and adherent to a synthetic realism, linked to the Return   pau-brasil production, she opposes the sensuality and
               Mário, by the way, is one of the few to be remembered   to Order [1] .  the enigmas of the new phase.
               in these celebrations with a solo exhibition, on display   The affectionate design, more interested in highlighting                                                              ***
               at the Afro Brasil Museum.        the companionship that involved the five friends, makes   In Helios, the taste for the elegant and the rare will
                 In the case of the two painters, it is interesting to note   Anita neutralize the  fin-de-siècle sumptuousness of   remain, since both he and his “mentor”, Menotti Del
               how they were, at the same time, elected to a prominent   Tarsila’s studio, maintained throughout the 1920s. from   Picchia, did not overcome their penchant for the excess
               role in Brazilian art due to their proximity to the ideas of   the textures of the countless pillows and rug as well as   of late-century language, full of allegories, verbal juggling
               the Week, but at the same time they paid a price for it. As   the sophisticated shape of a chair in the background – as   and far-fetched verbiage. A representative of the “B”
               Ana Paula Simioni demonstrates in Mulheres Modernistas   well as the decorative elements of the divan where the   side of modernism, Helios - Menotti -, will adopt, after
               , her involvement with the group ended up causing the gaze   portraitist represents herself lying down.  that joint portrait, an extreme nationalism, adhering to
               on her productions to be restricted to the initial period,                                                 ***  the most conservative and restrictive regimes, which
               with the rest of her work being for a long time seen as   If Anita is delicate and synthetic in her description of   will tend to intensify his antiquated belletrist discourse.
               decadent or inferior. They also end up being framed in   the studio, the same would not occur with a text by Helios   In fairness, however, it would also be important to note
               narrow models, Anita being eternally framed in the role   (a pseudonym of Menotti Del Picchia) in which he also   that Menotti on certain occasions – especially in his
               of “martyr”, victim of Monteiro Lobato’s attacks in the   talks about a meeting that took place in that same studio.   chronicles on Brazilian poetry and literature – will often
               criticism of his 1917 exhibition, and Tarsila in the role of   However, instead of five characters in Anita’s drawing,   assume a text structure closer to the other modernists
               “muse”, of the beautiful and seductive woman.  Helios describes six people: the same people who formed   (especially Oswald), sometimes “seriously” , sometimes
                 According to Simioni, one of the positive effects   the group of five, with the exception of Oswald, replaced by   with undisguised mockery intent.
               of celebrations like this one around the Week would   Jacques D’Avray – the pseudonym of senator Freitas Valle                                                       ***
               be a recovery of modernism as a research topic, with   [2] . Finally, Mario Amaral, popular guitarist, revered in the   Without knowing for sure where the blague ended
               emphasis on studies that seek to rescue artists or less   early 1920s in São Paulo, but little known today [3] . The   and the seriousness began, the fact is that Mário de
               studied phases, especially among women artists who   first five are gathered there to hear the guitarist’s music:  Andrade – another of the characters in Anita’s drawing
               have been relegated to a role for a long time. secondary            and Helios’ chronicle -, in 1922, already shows signs of
               or non-existent in the history of art. One of those figures   In the large workshop of Bulgarian pillows, where   having joined the Retorno à Ordem, as Anita. This is what
               who, according to her, deserves to be better known is Nair   the colors of Manilla’s mantles , riches of the bric-  is clear in a certain part of the Prefácio Interessantíssimo
               de Teffé, the first caricaturist in Brazil and possibly the   á-brac nobleman of this elegant and beautiful artist   that the author wrote for his book of poems, released
               world, who married none other than President Hermes   Tarsila do Amaral shouted, Mário’s guitar evoked   that year, Pauliceia desvairada :
               da Fonseca. Among the many merits of Nair is that of   all the music of race...
               having taken O Corta-jaca, a popular composition by                     (…) Now, according to moderns, Impressionism
               Chiquinha Gonzaga, into the Palácio do Catete in 1914.  Absorbed, vacant gaze, Jacques d’Avray, the strange   is a serious error.
                 “We fight for the past because we live in a present of   poet of the Ballads; Mário de Andrade, the long   Architects flee the Gothic as well as Art Nouveau,
               destruction”, says Ana Paula, in line with the idea defended   taciturn Pierrot of Pauliceia’s ravings; Anita Malfatti,   joining, beyond historical times, in the elementary
               by Lauro Cavalcanti that more than ever it is necessary   the misunderstood creator of the Yellow Man; Helios,   volumes: cube, sphere, etc. Painters disdain
               to celebrate modernity, as a way of counteracting the   quenched their thirst for beauty in the crystalline   Delacroix like Whistler, to lean on the constructive
               destruction of its legacy – it is enough see the dismantling   cascade of harmonies that sprouted, as in a live stream   calm of Raphael, Ingres, Greco. In sculpture Rodin
               of cultural structures that have been strategically   of the magical and sonorous guitar…  is bad, African imaginaries are good. The musicians
               orchestrated by the current government, such as the   One afternoon he walked [illegible], fading into violet   despise Debussy, kneeling before the cathedral
               dismantling of the Instituto do Patrimônio Histórico e   lacquers, begging the reflections of the glass for alms of   polyphony of Palestrina and João Sebastião Bach.
               Artístico Nacional (IPHAN), one of the most important   light for his dead eyes. No profane noise hurt the religious   Poetry… “tends to strip man of all his contingent and
               legacies of Mário de Andrade and his generation – without   silence, filled only by the divine music that Mário Amaral’s   ephemeral aspects, in order to capture humanity
               falling into the trap of using vital contemporary issues to,   nervous hands woke up. [4]  in him”…I am a past-timer, I confess (…) [6]
               anachronistically, make demands on the agents of the   If Anita zeroes in on the heavy and exotic atmosphere
               past. After all, it is necessary to be aware that, as Thiago   of the studio, it seems that it is precisely the somewhat   As every lie has a basis of truth, it is not strange that,
               Virava says, we have an “incomplete, flawed and full of   intoxicating dimension of this atmosphere that directs   behind the intelligent mist thrown on the text (was it blague
               holes modernity”.                 Helios’ writing, totally marked by a decadent bias, full   or was it serious?), Mario de Andrade was glossing the
                                                 of affected adjectives, far from modern objectivity. A   thought present in the manifesto After Cubismo , written
               Centennial week of 22 ArtIClE [PAGES 64 to 69]  little more text:   in 1918 by the painters Ozenfant and Charles-Edouard
                                                                                   Jeanneret (Le Corbusier):
               NOTES ON THE GROUP                    The suggestive, emotional music cut, in the   (…) Cubism became a decorative art of romantic
                                                     twilight that invaded the workshop , the Brazilian
               OF FIVE: A HINT OF                    landscape, at the still hour of the day in a death   ornamentalism.
                                                     trance, sick with melopeias, whispering of favonios
               MELANCHOLY IN THE                     rubbing the soft herbs. Then, in the “Blue Sky” a   There is a hierarchy in the arts; decorative art is at
                                                                                       the bottom, the human figure at the top.
                                                     vast firmament expanded in our souls, a region of
               CENTENARY OF THE                      peace and eternity... There seemed to be hearts
               WEEK                                  sobbing, up there, where passions overflow free   Painting is good when the qualities of its plastic
                                                     from conventionalists and restraints.
                                                                                      elements are good, not because of its possibilities
                                                                                      of representation or narrative.
               Drawing by Anita Malfatti in 1922, which   Mario Amaral’s great art, however, has all the prisms.
               portrays her alongside Mário de Andrade,   And, to the naively grotesque “pizzicatos” of “Melindres”,   PUrISMo expresses the invariant, not the variations.
               Tarsila do Amaral, Menotti Del Picchia   precious, bouncy, sensitive, we seemed to see bizarre   The work must not be accidental, exceptional,
               and Oswald de Andrade, presents authors   figures of small and sprightly dancers slipping on the   impressionistic, inorganic, protesting, picturesque,
                                                                                       but, on the contrary, general, static, an expression
                                                 lozenge of the vast Persian carpet, with skittish weights,
               who with time moved away artistically,   slithering gestures, gliding, smiling on their faces. mouth,   of the invariable.
               affectively and ideologically     sliding, smile in the mouth, soul in the eyes, naked, playful
                                                 and trembling ciranda rhythmic by the systoles of our   PUrISMo wants to conceive clearly, to execute
               By tAdEU CHIArEllI                hearts in parties… [5]                loyally, without falsehoods; he abandons disorderly
                                                                                                                103
                                                                                                                25/03/2022   11:00
         Book_ARTE_58.indb   103                                                                                25/03/2022   11:00
         Book_ARTE_58.indb   103
   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108