Page 122 - ARTE!Brasileiros #57
P. 122

ENGLISH VERSION EVERYTHING IN CHECK


        Raquel Arnaud. Villani never stopped working.  dominant. When, for example, Makunaima,   colonial complexity and the collectivity. So,
          Currently, he launches his new website, Julio   who is my grandfather – Macunaíma who is   if I arrived here, others will arrive here too.
        Villani, D’ICI, DE LÀ (julio-villani.com), and sets   on the cover of Mário de Andrade’s book –
        up his next exhibition at the GallEry rx & Slag   becomes a mere folklore. We say that Brazilian   The testimony in total is blunt and accurate. The
        Galleries, Paris, with a new branch in Chelsea,   folklore does not exist, it is an invention, it   loss is priceless, but the legacy is definitive.
        New York, where he presents, from December   is an appropriation of our cosmologies and
        9 to January 22, 2022, the show Julio Villani,   entities. An appropriation. And then, as if we   books JacQuEs rancièrE [paGE 104]
        Conflicting Perspectives. There are about 20   didn’t exist anymore, let’s turn this beautiful
        works, where the line and color are permanently in   story into Brazilian folklore.  RANCIÈRE REVIEWS
        tension. “If only one were to be missing, he says,
        the whole building could collapse,” says the text of   There is, on his part, a very adequate perception of   MODERNISM
        the catalogue. “There is a conflict between escape   the importance of the Bienal and of the art circuit
        lines and perspectives that I think is symptomatic   as a space for reflection, something similar to what   Author uses as references only texts by white
        of what I am – are we all? – living today”, confesses   Grada Kilomba defends. She, who was a professor   men from Europe and the United States
        the artist, thus revealing the choice of the title of   at Humboldt University in Berlin, decided to leave
        the exhibition.                    her academic career to devote herself to art,   By faBio cypriano
                                           realizing the scope and freedom of this field. It
        tribute JaidEr EsBEll [paGEs 100 to 103]  is very similar to what Jaider defends when he   if there is one plaCe where inClusion,
                                           presents the school as a “colonial apparatus”:  decolonialism and anti-racist debate are very
        JAIDER ESBELL’S WAR                                                  present, it is in the contemporary art scene.
                                             This Bienal, this stage, is a very important   Therefore, it is strange that Jacques Rancière’s
        In an interview, a Macuxi artist defended the   place, one of the last refuges of an idea of       new book, Modern Times: Temporality in Art
        occupation of art spaces as they would be   thought under construction, a place where we   and Politics, is dedicated to a kind of revision
        “one of the last refuges of an idea of thought   need to be. Much more than academia, much   of modernism only with references from male,
        under construction”                  more than party politics, much more than   white, European or American authors.
                                             bodies such as schools or churches, these    After all, his book Distributions of the Sensible:
        By faBio cypriano                    colonial and exotic apparatuses. (...) We call   Between Aesthetics and Politics, published in
                                             what we are doing contemporary indigenous   Brazil in 2005, is an important reference on the
        the  Death of JaiDer  esbell, aged 41, on   art, which we also know is not enough, that   understanding that a work of art should always be
        November 2, has shocked the contemporary art   it does not cover everything, but that it is   seen within the “fabric of experience”, as Rancière
        circuit. As Denilson Baniwa wrote, “Jaider has   necessary to attract some curious, attentive,   himself conceptualizes , therefore within a context.
        reached this place that for whites is considered a   willing to actually listen to some other story,    It’s true that the publication that comes out,
        success [but that] for both of us was, day by day,   who come to ask us: “What is contemporary   now in 2021, by publisher N-1, brings together four
        becoming a burden”.                  indigenous art?”. And we say: “It’s a trap to   texts already dated, most of them from 2015. Yes,
           Much has been said about this loss, but what   take good curious people to a place of deep   six years now, after #metoo and #blacklivesmatter,
        best accounts for this context is a long interview   reflection”, which, once again, does not fit in   it’s a sufficient period broad, because it changed
        that Jaider himself gave to Artur Tavares, published   the political movement, in the church, in the   cultural and academic paradigms, which no longer
        in full in the digital magazine Elástica, an excellent   judiciary, or anywhere else, because these   tolerate certain outdated practices.
        document on the thought of the indigenous activist   places were not made for that very reason.   In Brazil, this issue becomes even more
        (in full in https://elastica.abril.com.br/especiais/                 pertinent as reflections on the 100th anniversary of
        jaider-esbell-bienal-mam/).        Jaider also tells how his fight concerns the   the Modern Art Week, that happened in 1922, have
          In the interview, Jaider makes it clear how he and   indigenous peoples and not just him in particular,   already begun, and many seminars and events
        other indigenous leaders saw in the contemporary   when revealing that the mam São Paulo exhibition   have sought to review the anniversary from a
        art scene a form of militancy - and did not really   was proposed to be an individual and he modified   more inclusive perspective and that of authors
        claim to be a visual artist:       the project:                      and authors with different representations.

            This entire work with the Bienal is part of our   So the Bienal invited me because they liked   regime of the experienCe
           historical policy of indigenous resistance,   my work, and they wanted me to do a solo   Despite all this, the Marxist Rancière continues to
           which is an extension of a movement made   exhibition at MAM. I said that I woulnd’t do   seek to create concepts that can look at forms of
           invisible by the media themselves, the   a solo show, because I’m not solo. All my   emancipation, such as problematizing the notion
           grassroots movement. (...) We are talking   work is collective, everything I do is collective.   of modern as “building a new common sense, a
           about a place that is not exactly that of the   I would do it if it was a group show. That’s   new sensitive fabric in which prosaic activities
           plastic artist. I am not, in fact, a visual artist,   when we started to build the exhibition   receive the poetic value that it does from them
           even though within this performance everyone   Moquém_Surarî. The thing has to be strategic   the elements of a common world”.
           needs to embody this artistic persona to get   everywhere.         This “sensitive tissue” is also seen as a “regime
           to these very privileged places, like the Bienal                  of experience” and becomes part of the focus of
           de São Paulo itself, and not pass by there as   However, Jaider explains that clashes with the   this research: pointing out that the notion of linear
           another artist out there in the world.  art circuit were not easy and he did not feel   time in modernity must be rethought, as “time is
                                           contemplated by the attitudes of the Bienal de   not simply the stretched line between a past and
         Jaider also explains in the interview the differences   São Paulo, having to pay himself for the presence   a future. He is also, and above all, a way of living”.
        in times and procedures with the art circuit and   of other indigenous people:  Of the four texts in the publication, with a rather
        how it was necessary to contest the folklorization                   obvious homage to Charles Chaplin’s Modern
        of the indigenous presence both in the Bienal de   We are not satisfied. Because first the Bienal   Times, two of them are dedicated to specific art
        São Paulo and in the Moquém_Surarî exhibition,   said it didn’t want any indigenous. Now it’s   languages: dance and cinema.
        which he organized at the Museum of Modern Art   coming out in the media that the Bienal put   About dance, he points out the libertarian and
        of São Paulo (mam São Paulo):        I don’t know how many indigenous artists,   free character, especially from the 1920s and 1930s,
                                             that’s not true, we need to clarify. And there’s   approaching choreographers and dancers from
           In fact, we don’t let anything go by anyway, as   more. If they’re already up to it, getting off the   a wide spectrum: from the German expressionist
           things have been handled for over 500 years.   hook, this isn’t right. Because this comes at   Mary Wigman (1886-1973), precursor of dance-
           Our stories and our thoughts have always   a cost, and who is paying this bill is basically   theater, to the North American Lucinda Childs .
           been interpreted, introduced and shaped by   me – and I’m talking about money. Because    In the essay on cinema, Rancière deals with
           anthropologists, by priests, by politicians,   the Bienal pays a fee of 12 thousand reais,   specific scenes from three films: Man with a Movie
           while we were never able to print an authorial   take your work and forget about it. And then,   Camera (1929), by Dziga Vertov, The Grapes of
           thought that would properly place us in a place   when it comes to contemporary indigenous   Wrath (1940), by John Ford, and Juventude em
           of people who have their own worlds, their own   art, it is not enough. Because when you pick   Marcha (2006), by Portuguese Pedro Costa. At
           cosmologies. And then we have to parallelize   up a work by the artist, you get his/her whole   least there, Costa represents a certain marginality
           at all times with the culture that wants to be   story long before the colony. It takes all this   in the author’s very Eurocentric thought.
        122
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124