Page 105 - ARTE!Brasileiros #43
P. 105

Chile, Mexico and Peru for the idea of  determining a room for exhibitions of Latin   EXHIBITION SÃO PAULO | PAGES 36 TO 38
         Understand that the museum is a bridge, open collaborative agreements with  DIAS, GERCHMAN AND BARROS:
         American historical women, to create studies of gender, geopolitics and environment.
         embassies and biennials.                               A RESCUE OF FIGURATION
         A!B: In your opinion, what is the key moment of your participation, or the moment   THE THREE ARTISTS THAT WAS ON AN EXHIBITION AT SESC PINHEIROS
         that allows you to say, well...  “now I can leave”?
         This moment is Verboamérica, the new presentation of the permanent collection   MADE USE OF EVERYDAY IMAGES AS A WAY OF EXPRESSION AND
         that, Andrea Giunta and I do for the 15th year of the museum.  A GROWING APPROPRIATION OF THE GRAPHIC LANGUAGE
         Verboamérica was the sedimentation, the systematization of the work we had been
         doing. The work shifted and was seen and appeared in the modules of exhibition   BY MARIA HIRSZMAN
         bodies, affections and emancipation and on feminism, in room three. Or with Ximena   IN ART HISTORY, transition periods are always somewhat neglected. In an
         Garrido-Lecca that brings to the fore the extraction of minerals, in a module that   effort to present perfect syntheses of the dominant movements in a given period,
         talks about maps, geopolitics and extraction. A module that speaks of multitude,   researchers forget to illuminate gray areas, hybrid processes, jumping from
         work and endurance. That is why Alexander Apóstol appears with the questions of   certainties to certainties. Fortunately, from time to time, some efforts are made
         the workers. Or the Queer questions, so we understand why we made General Idea.  to understand the transient moments, as can be seen in the exhibition Between
         That is to say, to understand that Verboamérica, came to understand that America   Construction and Appropriation - Antonio Dias, Geraldo de Barros and Rubens
         Latina is not the object of study but the subject. It is the subject that studies the   Gerchman in the 60s, which was on display at Sesc Pinheiros until June 3rd.
         object itself. It means that we can see ourselves from within ourselves. Understand       It is not a reminiscent exhibition nor the conjunction of three mini-retrospectives.
         the nomenclatures no longer Europeanist or Anglo-Saxon. Decolonize the museum.  Constructed with vagueness and attention, the show proposes a complex plot
         Where the postcolonial history is narrated, where colonial history and traditional   between the work of the three artists and the artistic and cultural scene of
         modernity are assumed, but where “margins” are also studied. Everything you do   Brazil in the 1960s. At the same time that each of the contemplated poetics are
         not want to see. Negritude, women, the favela and the indigenous people.  unique, they are also strongly revealing of the deep tensions that the country was
         We have managed to create a link between curatorship, exhibitions, acquisitions and   experiencing at that time, both in cultural and political terms, as well as in relation
         how to work with education. The catalog begins with a glossary of terms, which link   to the transition process between the predominant type of art in the previous
         to the collection. The public can access and make suggestions.  decade (constructivism) and the gestation of a kind of artistic expression more
         It is very beautiful to see now that I am leaving something that makes sense as a   linked to pop art, a movement that originated in England in the 1950s and which,
         whole and, fundamentally, for those who work in the museum.  from the following decade, spread throughout the world under American primacy.
         A!B: What happens from your exit?                      As the visitor is remembered in a careful timeline assembled from texts and period
         From my departure, everything that has been implemented remains. The public   images that embraces the exhibition, listing several important events between the
         programs, the board. The president asked the curatorial committee to continue   years 1960 and 1968, it is a time marked by violent cultural transformations, by an
         the project. What can change is the content. I do not know what can happen in the   influence growing mass culture, for the struggle for individual freedoms throughout
         future, I have a kind of vision. There may come another artistic director whose   the world, at the same time as violence and repression internally created a boiling
         interest is different in certain themes. What interests me is having been able to   atmosphere.
         implement a working methodology. And this would be so good to stay. Whether it will   Explaining such an environment makes it easier to understand the moment of
         be maintained or not will depend on the decisions of the presidency and the board.   transition experienced by the three contemplated artists. If the rapprochement
         But the pedagogical and educational idea, transversal, research, cataloging, would be   between the productions of Antonio Dias, Geraldo de Barros and Rubens Gerchman
         very important to prevail. Many things remain to be done, and the ideal would be to   is not evident, to think them inserted in the wider cultural context makes the
         expand this quest. Have a “look to the future”. It is, yes, to continue the cataloging,   dialogue between them more explicit and makes their particular readings richer.
         the expansion of spaces to work and to exhibit. The collection has more than 700   Even coming from different generations and regions of the country, in the 1960s
         works and we can only expose 180. But we leave a pre-proposal of what is needed.  the three presented a redemption of figuration, the use of everyday images as
                                                                a form of expression and a growing appropriation of graphic language (which
         A! B: Augustin, why are you leaving?                   all explore in parallel to plastic poetry), leaving the search for geometric-
         My way out is joint. At my coming, there was an agreement where I would be between   constructive rigor, hegemonic in the previous decade. “There seems to have been
         three and five years old. In fact, there are personal questions. My companion and I   an exhaustion of constructive poetics tuned with the national-developmental
         are from Spain, we are a long time away from the family. But it is also necessary to   project,” explains curator João Bandeira. The conception of the exhibition, which
         understand that from a certain point of time there are small changes that I would   purposely extends the reflection beyond the field of visual arts, emphasizes the
         like to make and that the institution does not necessarily have the conditions to   steps taken by them towards a more expressionist type of matrix representation,
         follow, either for economic or ideological reasons. In this sense, with all that we   in which the deformation of the human figure assumes an increasing importance.
         have already done, it seems important to me to be clear that it is better to leave   It is curious to note throughout the exhibition - purposely idealized as a sort of labyrinth
         at the right time. It is very healthy to put a limit and close a story that was and is   in which one poetic leads to the other - the nexus between particular research and
         very good at the right time.                           general restlessness. According to Bandeira, in the period between the last neoconcret
                                                                exhibition (1961) and the anthological exhibition New Brazilian Objectivity (1967),
         A!B: What do you intend to do now?                     which counts with the participation of the three artists contemplated, a growing
         First I spend some time in Spain, and I want to spend some time managing projects   awareness that what had been done in the 1950s did not would apply more to the
         as an independent curator. I will settle in Madrid and I will travel to Buenos Aires,   aesthetic interests of the moment.
         Chile, Quito, Lima and Torino.                         From the veteran Geraldo de Barros (1923-1998), the exhibition brings a group of
                                                                works almost unpublished, in which there is an evident experimentation of new ways.
         A!B: Would you like to do a Biennial? Do you believe there are exhausted models?  The constructive forms of the 1950s give way to figurative compositions, such as urban
         I am a person more institutionally linked to the Museum than to the Biennial. I am a   flagrante. The serial character, strong mark in the work of Barros, is indisputable.
         member of the board of the Istanbul Biennial. In fact, it is interesting for a curator   All the paintings have the same size, were made on top of graphic material (giving
         to put into practice other formats. I’ve already done the Biennal of Nicaragua. But   the impression here and there the advertising grid) and using the colors yellow
         I’m more interested in giving myself the time to find another institution. I have the   and black. “Between one tendency and another, he got both,” jokes the healer.
         ability to manage and to achieve coherence between the different challenges that   Although a certain elegance deriving from the formal sensibility of Brazilian
         are built in the long term. In this sense, the Biennials are like freaks and do not   constructivism is more evident in Barros’ works, Bandeira makes it a point to emphasize
         necessarily allow to leave a legacy. Still, it is necessary to reformulate the concept   how the geometric pattern and the application of formal elements organizing the
         of Biennial. What really is expected of them.          space of plastic representation are also intensely present in the works of Antonio Dias
         Just as the nineteenth-century museum is exhausted in its formulation and we have   (1944) and Rubens Gerchman (1942). In this period, Dias’s production focuses on the
         to go after public programs and permanent activations, go after the exhibition is a   human body, which is rebuilt in pieces, rebuilt in three-dimensional shapes that leap
         trigger beyond the artistic act, the biennials are trying to try other formats, calling   from the canvases - in a mixture of eroticism, eschatology and violence - and which at
         artists as curators, commissioners, that a healer calls another healer, but this has   times makes direct allusions to brutality lived in the period of dictatorship, for example
         already been done at various other times. We must think about the concept and   in Carrasco, work of 1966 in which the legs of a hanged man are seen in the corner.
         new models more immersive.                             Rubens Gerchman is perhaps the most directly associated with pop art in the trio, for his
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110